Ultra-niche appeal. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. Yes, it adds a Wi-Fi connectivity, which is something completely new in my workflow, but the overall experience is so much simpler. First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. At0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. Display as a link instead, Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. I use along the two M240/262/etc. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. I will investigate that. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. : Leica M240 . It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. I'm in between the m262 bundle or a used 240. A few more differences - Leica M10 vs Leica M240. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! Thanks. The sensor is not the same, by the way. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. It is the successor to the world's first full-frame mirrorless camera, the LEICA M9 of 2009.. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. Source: DxOMark. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. I find it to be a useful feature at times. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. Why torture yourself? . but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. Ive had it for a month now. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Source: DxOMark. It was at this early stage that I noticed the first thing that has continued to make me scratch my head throughout the time I used the camera. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Keep up the good words! By I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. As such, the Leica M262 is possibly better seen as a sidestep rather than a step forward in the Leica lineup. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Thank you for pointing me to that review. Pasted as rich text. How important do you think live view will be for you? I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. has a removable battery. This really piqued my interest. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. Image: Leica. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. A M262 is a friendly camera. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life. Be the first. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. I didnt really need the better low light performance that the M262 offered, and was quite happy with the speed and output from the often lauded CCD sensor in the M9. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. Reduction of features is something no other brand of cameras shouts about, ever. Pera I think you might be giving a little to much benefit of the doubt there . The M Typ 240 can record in Full HD at 24, 25 or 30fps. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science. For me and my tastes though, the Leica M262 does feel like an advancement from the M240. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. Really useful! It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10.
A Comparison of Leica M10 and M240 Travel Is Beautiful Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that.
That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto.
Compared Usage Recommendations More.
Top 20 Best Fujifilm X30 Vs X100T Reviews & Comparison [Ultimate Guide] One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. These were live-view using the screen on the back or a slot in electronic viewfinder and video. Completely agree I really thought thats what they were going to do. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting.
Six Months With The Leica M Type 262 - PhotolisticLife Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. Paste as plain text instead, Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. Great article as always! Its just become a reason not to use the screen as much as I might have. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. The controls are easy to change while the camera is at your eye. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. By As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here.
Leica M10-R Review | Photography Blog In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. Leica M Typ 240. I currently have a q which is a lot of fun but I'm more interested in a rangefinder at this point. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors.
262 vs 240: Leica Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. The sensor is not the same, by the way. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. So I am very glad I got the 240 version. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. Help us by suggesting a value. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. To each his own. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime.
Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 Specifications Comparison The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . It offered a more stripped back feature set than the M240, but it does still have live view. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. Yet all the buttons on it and the LCD still have me pining for Leicas. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. The transport lever on the Leica M3. Which despite it feeling like something that would really suit me as someone who prefers to operate without the need for any sort of menu driven interface on their cameras was still a fairly small feature for quite a lot more cash!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); As such I bought an M262 and fairly happily got on with shooting it for the best part of a year. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. Yura, I still use both with other M along. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. Hi everyone. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. BudfoxJuly 7, 2016 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). I have both and haven't noticed any difference but I haven't done a side by side comparison. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240.
In-depth review of the Leica M262 - Leica and Rangefinders - Photo.net I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. Leica M262 - "A Leica M240 in a Leica M9 body" The Leica M 262 that Leica Camera AG surprisingly introduced November 2015 is basically a Leica M 240 in a Leica M9 body. To me this seems like a hassle. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers.
LEICA M typ 240 Review - Ken Rockwell Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! High ISO performance a must wish it was even better. Source: DxOMark. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. I wish I did. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. Quality over quantity.
Leica M [typ 240] Review - A brief relationship - 35mmc It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. Great write up! Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. I am primarily a Nikon digital and film shooter, and my quest for minimalism and the fact that I already own a Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera were the major reasons to sell the digital Leica 262. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. For the M240, forget it. Weight is certainly a thing though! Some cards are woefully slow. I do use this feature fairly often as an alternative to using a screw in BW filter. Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. The M240 shot..more DR it seems. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! Image Quality. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. The Leica M10 's physical controls are logical, simple, and offer the right amount of resistance. I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. Paste as plain text instead, Is the 262 different in this regard? Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6.
Monochromatic Rendering - Comparing the Leica M10, Leica M240, Leica It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. I did, yes I have an M10-P now. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Which is the better buy? (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. Same lens, same settings - desaturated during RAW conversion. Of course they can, but you have them. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features. As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. This friendly dig on Facebook from Alex Hakimi somewhat sums up how ridiculous all this really is: if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); Anyway, the point is, at one stage, not all that long ago, I was very happy with the M262 and didnt really feel like the M10 could possibly bring any advantages to me. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. Image quality will be essentially the same.
: Leica M240 - Famefix 'S Blog Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? Loomis77December 27, 2020 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). Seems I do once again. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras.
Opinions, recommendations: M10 v. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246 Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. The wider width of the M240 has never bothered me but the new M10 does look good a little slimmed down. Forget is a strong word. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. And so I had to do a paradoxical thing. This page contains all hands-on, detailed Camera Reviews that have been published at Photography Life. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} Clear editor. - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. Have a read of this for tips. Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera. Another M10 fetish. Cheers! So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. The body is pretty well weather sealed. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom.